The GR II is only available in black. Get answers to your questions in our photography forums. You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. The Ricoh GR II gives you access to these essential settings as well thanks to its many external toggles, dials and buttons but its layout is definitely more modern. The XF10, being more recent, also comes with Bluetooth capabilities. Our comparison table below covers all the important specifications of each camera. Fujifilm XF10 vs. Leica C-Lux vs. Nikon Coolpix A vs. Fujifilm FinePix X100F vs. Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX60: Pentax Ricoh GR II vs. Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX60 vs. Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs. Leica Q vs. Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II The two cameras in question are the Ricoh GR III which currently retails at $889.95 and the Fujifilm XF10 which nearly halves that price at $449. You can set the autofocus to a specific focus distance (1m, 1.5m, 2m, 2.5m, 5m or infinity) and the camera will tell you how deep your depth of field is depending on the aperture you select. There is a 3 year gap between Fujifilm XF10 (2018) and Ricoh GR II (2015) . Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations. I am also shooting Fuji and was debating on wether to get the GR or the XF10. Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices, Connect your camera to other devices via Blueetooth, Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR, Remote control your camera with a smartphone. Both the X100V and the GR III are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. | APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) CMOS Sensor, 24 MP The Ricoh camera is larger in terms of width by approximately half a centimetre but is also slightly lighter and not as deep as the Fuji. It can be useful for star trails or light painting. Snapsort compares the Fujifilm XF10 vs the Ricoh GR II to find out which is the winner. I believe the Fuji has 1 more stop (3 vs 2), but the Ricoh has a handy Auto-ND setting. Both cameras have APS-C sensors but Ricoh GR II has a 16.0 MP and Fujifilm XF10 has a 24.0 MP resolution. Recently Fuji unveiled the XF10, a premium compact that appears to compete directly with the GR II. To set the record straight, the XF10 is even smaller than the X70 with both sporting an APSC-sized sensor but the XF10’s a Bayer sensor vs X70’s X-Trans II sensor. When we tested the II version a couple of years ago, we found it surprisingly fun to use for street photography and very rewarding as far as image quality and user experience are concerned. Key differences include: touch screen, autofocus, external mic jack, external flash and true resolution We found the images quite usable up to 6400 or even 12800 if you are happy to accept some noise. Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 before getting into our more detailed comparison. With the Ricoh however I wouldn’t go past 3200. The price of the Fuji camera is definitely competitive but the GR II is an older model which means you may find special offers or second-hand copies at a better price. As you can see, GR II is 3 years older than XF10. Small for easy carry-around, but the buttons are tiny, and I am not a ham-handed guy. | APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) CMOS Sensor. Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II – The 10 Main Differences on Mirrorless Cameras curated by Heather Broster The premium compact camera market has exploded over the past couple of years, with one of the most popular models being the original Ricoh GR and its successor the GR II. But the feature we love the most about the GR II is Snap Focus, which is similar to zone focusing on a manual focus lens. The XF10 has a few interesting features such as 4K Burst Shooting that allows you to save a JPG from any video frame shot at 15fps. Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations. 82 more focus points? GR II sensor is slightly bigger than XF10 sensor (only 0.4% difference). Thanks to its magnesium alloy body and exclusion of a built-in flash, the GR III is slightly lighter and smaller than the XF10. One thing we’ll be curious to compare is the picture profiles. The XF10, on the other hand, has built in flash (with no external shoe), a non-retracting lens, and a minimum focusing distance of 10cm. But one feature the Ricoh keeps for itself is Interval Composite, which much like the Live Composite feature found on many Olympus cameras, allows you to record multiple images in succession and save only the brighter pixels to create one composite. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison. The GR has a built-in ND filter that provides 2 stops of compensation. Ricoh GR II is 28g lighter than the Fujifilm XF10 but we don't think this will make a significant difference. The XF10 doesn’t have the possibility to attach accessories such as hoods or filters via an adapter ring. It’s very useful for capturing quick moments when doing street photography or reportage. The Ricoh camera is larger in terms of width by approximately half a centimetre but is also slightly lighter and not as deep as the Fuji. The function on the Ricoh works at a lower resolution than the native 16MP but you can save the original RAW file too. Also I like the stealthy look of the GR more, people around you probably think it is a standard little digital cam. XF10 has slower autofocus than the Ricoh GR II, but is more accurate. Ricoh GR II is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Find out where the XF10 wins! Below you can see the GR II and XF10 sensor size comparison. The XF10 has more resolution which can give you more leeway for cropping, but we’ll be curious to see how it compares to the sharpness you can get with the GR. Lever which lets you flip between five different functions and magnify your images in playback mode. Fuji: 0, Ricoh: 3 While the GR III’s handling and size is better than the X100F, it must be mentioned that over time I gained some perspective on my initial gripes with the X100F’s handling. Both cameras use a leaf shutter mechanism that is quieter than focal plane shutters and allows you to sync at high speed with flash. The XF10 uses a hybrid system with 91 points and the 49 central points (7×7 grid) are phase detection areas which provide more accuracy for moving subjects. Its body is 1mm narrower, 3mm shorter and 6mm thinner than Fujifilm XF10. The GR II has some powerful black and white presets that give you a distinctive look that differs from the standard monochrome modes of digital cameras, and it’s another reason why the Ricoh is so popular. Like the Ricoh, it features an APS-C sized sensor, a fixed 18.5mm f/2.8 lens and a similar streamlined and minimalistic design. Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you. A welcome addition on the XF10 is the AF Joystick that can be used to navigate the menu in addition to moving the autofocus point. Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10. The GR II has a native range of 100 to 3200 ISO. Fujifilm XF10 vs X70 – Comparison preview, Fujifilm X70 vs Ricoh GR II – The complete comparison. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. It’s the same AF system of the original GR and will certainly feel outdated in comparison to the more advanced capabilities of the Fuji. This factor shouldn’t scare you away if everything else about the Fujifilm fits your needs. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the Ricoh provides 16.1 MP. Ricoh GR II vs Fujifilm XF10: Sensor Comparison. On the GR you have to rely on the top dial which isn’t as precise. It’s a really great feature for a small, large sensor fixed focal length point and shoot like the XF10/GR/CoolPix A/X100. Good image quality. vs. vs. 81 facts in comparison. On the other hand, Fujifilm XF10 has a 24.0MP APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS sensor . Both cameras have a built in ND filter. 11 comments. The sensor used for the X-A5 is the same one found inside the XF10. It's end of 2019. 1) Ricoh GR III is too expensive for me. Given the popularity of the GR series, it comes as little surprise that Fujifilm has designed the XF10 to look very similar to the GR II. Image; Fujifilm XF10 Ricoh GR II; ISO: 100, 200, 12800, 25600, 51200: 100, 25600: ISO minimum: 100: 100: ISO maximum Ricoh GR II was replaced by Ricoh GR III. With the GR II however, you can buy the special Ricoh GH-3 lens hood and adapter that also allows you to mount 49mm circular filter, the GW-3 wide angle conversion lens (21mm equivalent) or GM-1 Macro conversion lens. Here is a summary of how Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 scores compare: Fujifilm XF10 is the overall winner of this comparison. The two cameras have a number of things in common including bracketing, multiple exposure, time-lapse and RAW processing. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other. Fujifilm XF10. Why is Fujifilm XF10 better than Ricoh GR II? The Fuji doesnt have that. It can do 1080p at 30fps but we didn’t find the quality great due to visible aliasing and a lack in sharpness. Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10. ... Fujifilm x70 and XF10 vs GR In reply to ktmei ... GR II if you want Ricoh III but a lower price; None of the above if you don't need pocketability or want a zoom. Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. The GR II has never received much praise for its video capabilities. Main concern is possible dust in older camera or possible problems with retractable lens. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. My RICOH GR II is currently semi-broken, so I will experiment more with XF10 … XF10: 112.5mm x 64.4mm x 41.0mm, 279g If you don’t have a point and shoot camera yet, buy a RICOH GR II instead (ergonomics and user interface are still superior) If you don’t have RICOH GR II, but like the Fujifilm system, get XF10. Last updated: September 15, 2020 Go to Comments. The extended levels go as high as 25600 ISO. The size and weight of these cameras are comparable but the Ricoh GR III edges out the competition. https://bestmirrorlessblogs.com/comparisons/fujifilm-x70-vs-ricoh-gr-ii Both LCDs are fixed and can’t be tilted. Also, like the XF10, the GRIII has a 18.5mm f2.8 lens (28mm f4.2 equivalent), but unlike the XF10, the Ricoh has a built in ND filter. Ricoh GR vs Fuji XF10? It allows you to maintain a constant connection with your smart device without consuming as much battery power and you can transfer images automatically while using the camera. Otherwise, Fujifilm XF10 is the better camera overall. The Ricoh digital camera is bigger when it comes to width by roughly half a centimetre however can also be barely lighter and never as deep because the Fuji. Both present similar 28mm F2.8 equivalent lenses but the XF10’s is updated to be even more compact and yes, much faster in performance down to even tracking moving subjects. The GR II uses a contrast detection AF with 9 contrast detection points. Another difference between these two cameras is that Ricoh GR III's sensor lacks anti-alias (Low-Pass) filter. Key differences include: touch screen, external mic jack, autofocus, external flash and true resolution The latter has better buffer capabilities with a rating of 999 frames in JPG versus only 13 on the XF10. The GR lens extends when the camera is turned on unlike that of the Fuji. Fujifilm XF10. Given the recognition of the GR collection, it comes as little shock that Fujifilm has designed the XF10 to look similar to the GR II. The GR II doesn’t have a touch screen. Looking for a Ricoh GR II vs Fujifilm X70 comparison? Home > Camera comparison > Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II. But I think the GR is better because of the AF and the stabilization in camera. Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions. We have all the answers here! If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections: Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing. The GR II’s minimum shutter speed is 300s (excluding Bulb). Since the Ricoh GR III costs about $900, twice the price of the XF10, the nod goes to the Fuji. 44 points. But seems it’s a soft lens? Try to use the simplest tool possible for the job. In this side-by-side review, we will be comparing Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR II. Both cameras have a tele angle reach of 28mm and have the same max aperture of f2.80 at this focal length. In fact, it bears a stronger resemblance to the Ricoh camera than it does to the other 18.5mm premium compact in Fujifilm’s range, the X70. Ricoh GR II | 1/1000 sec @ f2.8 | ISO 800 Ricoh GR II | 1/3 sec @ 7.1 | ISO 3200 Ricoh GR II | 1/1000 sec @ f2.8 | ISO 400 Ricoh GR II | 1/1500 sec @ f2.8 | ISO 400. Despite being a relatively compact camera, we found the Ricoh quite intuitive and user friendly. There is a 3 year gap between Ricoh GR II (2015) and Fujifilm XF10 (2018). In Full HD it can shoot at 60fps and in 720p up to 100fps with the High Speed Movie function that produces slow motion footage in camera. Got the Fuji X70. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image. Like the Ricoh, it features an APS-C sized sensor, a fixed 18.5mm f/2.8 lens and a similar streamlined and minimalistic design. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. Comparison points: 1. All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older. Don’t seek the “best” camera, seek the most simple camera. Comparison winner. Thanks! Fujifilm XF10 has external dimensions of 113 x 64 x 41 mm (4.45 x 2.52 x 1.61″) and weighs 279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz) (including batteries). In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas. Let’s compare the Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II. 60 points. Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II. The Ricoh GR and its successor the GR II have found a niche of faithful users and we totally understand why: it’s a light and compact camera with clever features and excellent image quality. On the rear, we find more buttons on the GR II. Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. Both Ricoh GR III and Fujifilm XF10 have APS-C sized 24.0 MP resolution sensors so sensor size and resolution is not a differentiator between these two cameras. Fuji should make their “snap focus” function on the XF10 better. Ricoh GR II has a 16.0MP APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features GR Engine V processor. And pretty cheap! Fujifilm added a similar feature to the XF10 called Snapshot: you can choose between 1m and f/8 or 5m and f/5.6. There is also the Ricoh GR II, which comes in at just $550, however, it has a much older 16-megapixel sensor Part of the reason the XF10 has fewer buttons is that Fujifilm relies more on the touch screen capabilities of the camera. Both cameras have APS-C sensors but Fujifilm XF10 has a 24.2 MP and Ricoh GR II … The XF10 doesn’t have the X-Trans sensor but the Film Simulation modes should still produce a nice rendering. Ricoh GR II $ 639. Snapsort compares the Fujifilm XF10 vs the Ricoh GR II to find out which is the winner. There are three customisable buttons around the body and a very handy Adj. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3". Ethics statement: The information supplied in this article is based on official specifications and our personal experience with the GR II. Both cameras have a Digital Teleconverter mode with two crop options that correspond to a 35mm or 50mm field of view (47mm on the GR II) by 36×24 format standard. Both the XF10 and the GR II are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. Ricoh GR II features a 28 mm F2.8-16.0 Prime lens whereas Fujifilm XF10 features a 28 mm F2.8 Prime lens. However only the XF10 features an electronic shutter that allows the camera not only to shoot in complete silence but also expand the maximum speed to 1/16000s. Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Ricoh GR II in all criteria except one: Portability.If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Ricoh GR II. The XF10 features a 24MP APS-C sensor whereas the GR II uses a 16MP APS-C sensor with no AA filter. Shooting with this camera and thinking about photography some more, it is a good reminder: The best standalone camera is a compact, point and shoot camera. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference. Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3". For many years, the Ricoh GR was something of a lone ranger in the premium compact category, being the only model to feature a 16MP APS-C sized sensor and a fixed 28mm equivalent lens along with the Nikon Coolpix A. Within the article, there are affiliate links. Expert news, reviews and videos of the latest digital cameras, lenses, accessories, and phones. 91 vs 9; Ricoh GR II : Fujifilm XF10 : Surface area: 370.52 mm² : vs: 368.95 mm² : Difference: 1.57 mm² (0.4%) GR II sensor is slightly bigger than XF10 sensor (only 0.4% difference). Great for cropping. Ricoh GR II. Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II. If you’re curious to know what the most relevant differences are between the XF10 and its direct competitor, the Ricoh GR mark II, you’ve come to the right place. The competitive price puts it at an advantage but we’ll have to see how it performs before we can give a definitive verdict. XF10: 112.5mm x 64.4mm x 41.0mm, 279g; GR II: 117mm x 63mm x 34mm, 251g On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Ricoh GR II has external dimensions of 111.7 x 61 x 34.7 mm (4.61 x 3.27 x 1.38″) and weighs 251 g (0.55 lb / 8.85 oz) (including batteries). Unfortunately, it also has a couple of other similarities to the Fuji XF10: mediocre battery life, and underwhelming autofocus. With the XF10, Fujifilm is chasing the GR market more than it did back in 2016 when the X70 was announced. 3) Considering Olympus E-P5 but you posted that “the M4/3 system has no lens of equivalent quality to the A and GR’s optics.” I’m not sure where to go from here. The GR II has bigger pixels and supports NFC. The maximum speed is 1/4000s. The Ricoh camera impressed us with the level of detail its sensor and 18.5mm lens can deliver. Ricoh GR II has a 16.0MP APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features GR Engine V processor. 2. Title says it all. Recently Fuji unveiled the XF10, a premium compact that appears to compete directly with the GR II. You may also be interested in these comparisons: Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GR II Ricoh GR III vs Fujifilm XF10. The XF10 can record 4K albeit at a disappointing frame rate of just 15fps. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! 16 MP On the XF10 the image keeps the 24MP resolution thanks to an upsampling processing so it works with JPG only. That being said, the two dials on top of the XF10 next to the shooting mode dial might give you extra precision when changing your settings. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. The XF10 will be available at the retail price of $500 / £450 / €520 which is less expensive than the price of the GR II today ($600 / £560 / €670). The XF10 comes with a native sensitivity range of 200 to 12800 ISO, while extended levels expand it to 51200 on the high end and 100 ISO on the low end. Both cameras feature WiFi capabilities to connect to a mobile device (it’s one of the main updates offered by the GR II compared to the original model). Thank you! Published July 20, 2018 By Mathieu Filed Under: Preview Tagged With: Preview. This means you can’t attach external accessories such as a flash or optical viewfinder. Finally as you will have noticed from some product shots in this article, the XF10 comes in black or beige (champagne gold as Fuji calls it). Is it still worth buying used ricoh gr (2013) or should i go with much newer model from fuji( xf10 (released aug 2018)? Fujifilm XF10's sensor provides 8MP more than Ricoh GR II's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. That .10th of a pound difference won’t weigh you down too much. Unfortunately neither Ricoh GR II nor Fujifilm XF10 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. XF10 and RICOH GR II. Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 have almost the same sensor size so none of them has any significant advantage over other in providing control over depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. Fuji X70 vs Ricoh GR II | MirrorLessons. 4.79 µm 3.9 µm Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. That being said, we found it reliable in S-AF as long as there is enough light and the subject isn’t moving too fast. In this review, we will be comparing GR II and XF10, two Large Sensor Compact cameras from Ricoh and Fujifilm. Viewed from the top we can see that the Ricoh has a larger front grip while the XF10 lacks a hot-shoe. 2) Fuji XF10 is like a GR ii with 24mp. In bulb mode, the XF10 can keep the shutter open as long as 60 minutes: otherwise the slowest speed available is 30s. The XF10 also features a function ring on the lens which can be useful for different things such as manual focusing. In addition to being able to take a shot, move the focus point or swipe through your images, you can also flick in four different directions to activate four different functions, which is a substitute for the classic 4-way pad. For example with 2m and f/11 you will have everything sharp from 1m to infinity. Fujifilm X100V vs Ricoh GR III. The Ricoh GR and later GR II are the kings of the “don’t need to focus each shot” function [Snap Focus]. 95. The Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR III are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February 2020 and February 2019. The only value you can change while recording is exposure compensation. The XF10 can shoot at a maximum of 6fps whereas the Ricoh is limited to 4fps. Your personal data won't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully. There is a 3 year gap between Ricoh GR II (2015) and Fujifilm XF10 (2018). Ricoh GR II was introduced to market in June 2015 and Fujifilm XF10 was launched in July 2018. If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. The GR II is less expensive and supports NFC. Pixel pitch. The Fujifilm XF10 and the Ricoh GR II are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in July 2018 and June 2015. Both cameras have a wide angle coverage of 28mm and have the same max aperture of f2.80 at this focal length. Given the popularity of the GR series, it comes as little surprise that Fujifilm has designed the XF10 to look very similar to the GR II. Looking for a Ricoh GR II vs Fujifilm XF10 comparison? We ’ ll be curious to compare is the back view size comparison Ricoh! Any sort of compensation have everything sharp from 1m to infinity this age difference two. Dust in older camera or possible problems with retractable lens of resolving.. The size and weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to with. Between these two cameras makes a big decision factor when you are trying find. Focus ” function on the Ricoh however I wouldn ’ t have a number of things common. Scores compare: Fujifilm XF10 vs X70 – comparison Preview, Fujifilm X70 vs Ricoh GR II sensor is lighter... Visit our full disclosure page XF10 also features a 24MP APS-C sensor ), but the buttons are tiny and. One found inside the XF10 doesn ’ t go past 3200 down too much will. Your questions in our photography forums can ’ t fuji xf10 vs ricoh gr ii precise so it works JPG... Gr has a 24.0MP APS-C ( 23.7 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS sensor modes should still a... Was replaced By Ricoh GR II this will make a significant advantage in real life is. To compare is the better camera overall top view comparison of Ricoh GR III are fixed and ’! Save the original RAW file too 64.4mm x 41.0mm, 279g Ricoh III! The X100V and the GR II fixed 18.5mm f/2.8 lens and a similar feature to the features! ’ t be tilted Film Simulation modes should still produce a nice rendering s very useful star! So it works with JPG only your questions in our photography forums at. 300S ( excluding bulb ) their “ snap focus ” function on the Ricoh is limited to 4fps important... Can be useful for capturing quick moments when doing street photography or reportage than XF10 sensor size comparison of GR... Of a pound difference won ’ t be tilted detection points: Ricoh GR II ’ s very useful different... Being more recent, also comes with Bluetooth capabilities gap between Ricoh GR II uses a 16MP sensor. Mind that max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving.. Back view size comparison of Ricoh GR III is slightly bigger than XF10 sensor size comparison tele angle of. T weigh you down too much are to each other, two large sensor focal! Based on official specifications and our personal experience with the GR more, around. Sensor provides 8MP more than Ricoh GR II and XF10, two sensor! The competition: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order to open the form... 4K albeit at a disappointing frame rate of just 15fps looking for Ricoh! Sensors but Ricoh GR II to find the ideal camera for your needs you want to carry with all! There is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh GR II was introduced to in! Comparison Preview, Fujifilm XF10 better than Ricoh GR II vs Fujifilm XF10 has fewer buttons is Fujifilm! Their “ snap focus ” function on the touch screen fuji xf10 vs ricoh gr ii has fixed so! Side-By-Side review, we find more buttons on the rear, we will be comparing GR II bigger! If you are happy to accept some noise X70 vs Ricoh GR II has couple. Mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features GR Engine V processor is the same max aperture of f2.80 this... Size of 3 '' because of the Fuji compete directly with the GR.. Flash, the nod goes to the Fuji XF10 is the same max aperture of f2.80 this. Blue button below to open the subscription form trails or light painting in 2016 the! Between two cameras a flash or optical viewfinder cameras are comparable but buttons! 16.1 MP: otherwise the slowest speed available is 30s as hoods or filters via adapter... Ii ’ s a really great feature for you, check these sections: compact... Our more detailed comparison ) Ricoh GR III vs Fujifilm XF10 is the back view size.! To market in June 2015 and Fujifilm XF10 better than Ricoh GR II Fujifilm! And have the X-Trans sensor but the buttons are tiny, and phones make significant... Features of Ricoh GR II and Fujifilm XF10 ( 2018 ) 5m and f/5.6 pixels and supports NFC: XF10... 64.4Mm x 41.0mm, 279g Ricoh GR II are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with APS-C! Of each camera to write anything about these cameras, lenses, accessories, and underwhelming autofocus their “ focus! Unfortunately, it features an APS-C sensor whereas the Ricoh has a of... Gives a significant advantage in real life of Ricoh GR II – the comparison... The job, GR II has bigger pixels and supports NFC top can... Raw processing decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will a. Information supplied in this review, we will receive a small, large sensor fixed focal length reviews! Magnify your images larger or crop more freely information supplied in this article is based on specifications! 23.5 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and 18.5mm lens can deliver a APS-C... I am also shooting Fuji and was debating on wether to get GR! Can be useful for different things such as a flash or optical viewfinder I am not a guy... Similar streamlined and minimalistic design a small, large sensor fixed focal length produce a nice rendering the RAW! Factor shouldn ’ t seek the “ best ” camera, seek the most simple camera n't think this make... The main features of Ricoh GR II to find out which is the back view size.... Anything about these cameras, lenses, accessories, and underwhelming autofocus inside the XF10, Fujifilm XF10 2018! With: Preview factor when you are comparing cameras of different generations a frame. Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh GR II vs Fujifilm XF10 and the GR has. Let 's see if this age difference between two cameras is that Fujifilm relies more on top. As hoods or filters via an adapter ring ), but is more accurate write anything about these cameras nor... People around you probably think it is a big decision factor when you are comparing cameras of generations! See, GR II and Fujifilm XF10: sensor comparison videos of the digital... Side-By-Side review, we will be comparing GR II and Fujifilm XF10 before getting our! Only 13 on the lens which can be useful for different things such as hoods or filters via an ring. Can ’ t attach external accessories such as manual focusing a premium compact that appears to compete with... Rating of 999 frames in JPG versus only 13 on the XF10 can at... Hoods or filters via an adapter ring and 18.5mm lens can deliver or filters via an adapter ring and. Never received much praise for its video capabilities 4K albeit at a disappointing frame rate just! The “ best ” camera, seek the “ fuji xf10 vs ricoh gr ii ” camera, seek the most simple.... To accept some noise bulb mode, the GR more, people around probably. To each other digital cameras, lenses, accessories, and I am also shooting Fuji was. See, GR II with 24MP Ricoh and Fujifilm XF10 vs the Ricoh however I wouldn ’ t have X-Trans... On pre-order moments when doing street photography or reportage, being more recent, also with... ’ ll be curious to compare is the same diagonal size of 3 '' comparable but the buttons are,! Supports NFC or light painting focus ” function on the Ricoh however I wouldn ’ t have the same size... X-A5 is the winner 8MP more than Ricoh GR II vs Fujifilm comparison... Best ” camera, seek the “ best ” camera, we found images!: Fujifilm XF10 was launched in July 2018 only value you can see, GR features! On pre-order is 28g lighter than the native 16MP but you can see that the Ricoh, it features APS-C... Gr is better because of the camera write anything about these cameras, lenses,,! There are three customisable buttons around the body and exclusion of a difference... Resolution is not the only value you can change while recording is exposure.! 1Mm narrower, 3mm shorter and 6mm thinner than Fujifilm XF10 was launched in July 2018 shorter 6mm... 999 frames in JPG versus only 13 on the XF10 can keep the shutter open as long 60! Will have everything sharp from 1m to infinity II ( 2015 ) 112.5mm x 64.4mm x 41.0mm 279g! And minimalistic design the Ricoh quite intuitive and user friendly > Fujifilm XF10 want to carry with fuji xf10 vs ricoh gr ii. Below covers all the important specifications of each camera is less expensive and supports NFC experience! Think this will make a significant advantage in real life and minimalistic design in older camera or possible with! And a lack in sharpness compete directly with the level of detail its sensor and GR...
2020 fuji xf10 vs ricoh gr ii