First off, it has image stabilization, the sensor-shift kind. 5 februari, 2018 - 09:01. Sony A7 III advantages over Sony A7S II. So how does the camera stand up against the latest arrival in the full-frame E-mount range, the A7 III? Noise levels on the a7S II are far better than those on the FS5, especially when you get up above 3200 ISO. Sony a7III vs a7sII vs a6500 Review & Low Light Video Test. Naturally the camera can record 4K up to 30fps and 100mbps with the XAVC S codec. That being said, the A7s II remains a reference when it comes to low light performance, and this is why it is used worldwide for many productions, including the recent BBC Planet Earth and Blue Planet II. The A7s mark II has been designed for video more than stills and this is why Sony chose a lower resolution sensor with 12MP. Below: a 4K video sample from Sony on YouTube. It can be found for around $2500 / £2400 / €2600. The menu system is more well-organised on the new camera, and there are more customisation options including the My Menu page where you can save up to 30 settings. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! Clearly the camera is not designed for action photography. Up to ISO 4000, I haven’t noticed any significant difference between the two cameras, though I know that the A7III, should look better, at least on paper, as you went beyond that. To … It offers a good balance in terms of resolution in that it has enough megapixels for stills without being too excessive for video. The minimum sensitivity is one stop darker at -4Ev. This is valid for stills and video, the latter being the main target of this camera. For years, Sony’s A7SII has been touted as arguably the best low-light camera. Note that these prices can vary according to country, not to mention that you’ll often come across special discounts from time to time. Instead of waiting for the a7iii for another 3/4/who knows months, I was thinking about picking up the a7ii with the G Master 24 - 70 and G Master 85. By comparison, the A7s II can manage 55/60 minutes. Both cameras can record in 4K up to 30fps using the XAVC S codec, which works at 100Mbps. I'm planning on shooting a night scene, and I'm planning to rent the A7sii for its low-light capabilities and having decided to shoot in Cine 4 (as S-Log seems to have too much a learning curve and I have limited chances to learn Log). The most video-centric camera in the A7 range is without a doubt the A7s II. I would shoot up to 25,600 ISO with the a7S II on a news or documentary shoot at a push. Last updated: September 15, 2020 Go to Comments. While evaluating the low-light tests in the video, though, both the standard low-light test (dim light sources) and the extreme test (single candle light source), an interesting pattern emerged. You could have the A7iii and the Sony 24 1.4 GM lens for about the same or less money than the A7r4 body. The A7III footage is rarely usable beyond 52,200, but I’ve frequently used A7SII footage at ISO 102,400 and sometimes up to 204,800. $1898 vs $2398* Save money for lenses or accessories. However the way in which these two sensors have been designed follows a similar logic. Pitting the two cameras against each other as in the real Sony a7S vs a7SII showdown, the a7SII comes out as the clear winner and you’ll soon see why. My primary reason for going with the A7S is for filming in low light/no light situations. In our tests, the a7III really is the best mirrorless hybrid camera of 2018. Gear & Gadgets. Check price of the Sony A7 III on:Amazon | Amazon UK | B&H Photo | eBay, Check price of the Sony A7s II on:Amazon | Amazon UK | B&H Photo | eBay, Sony A7 / A9 Guides, How-To and Tutorials, Published March 1, 2018 By Mathieu Filed Under: Preview Tagged With: Preview. Sony A7III vs A7SII - LOW LIGHT test in 4K (S-LOG2) - YouTube Take photos in low light with less noise. Both cameras feature 5-axis sensor stabilisation but the A7 III has a more advanced hardware that increases the compensation to 5.0Ev in comparison to the 4.5Ev rating of the A7S II (CIPA standards). I know folks who own proper cinema cameras who were pretty floored that all those features ran for only $2,000. The low light sensitivity has also improved with -6Ev on the A7S model vs -3Ev on the A7 III (both measured at f/2). Sony supplies the A7s II with one charger and two batteries, whereas the A7 III comes with a single battery and no charger. It works during video recording and can be useful to produce smooth transitions between focus areas, especially when you tweak the AF Track Sensor and AF Drive Sens settings in the menu. Sony A7S II advantages over Sony A7S. It also has 425 contrast detection points, -3Ev sensitivity and a few extra settings such as AF Track Sensor that controls the reactivity of the AF in continuous mode. The A7S II only works with contrast detection and features 169 points (25 plus the nine central that are divided into 16 segments). When dealing with low light situations, choosing between RAW and JPEG can lead to different results. In fact, as the title denotes, it’s the best low-light 35mm full-frame camera they’ve tested, beating out the A7Sii. Hi, first post. What this test’s finding boils down to is that Sony’s new cheapest full-frame camera has become one of the top performers in low-light performance (perhaps just behind the a7S II). Perfect examples are the Sony A7III vs A7RIII or the Panasonic S1 vs S1R. Sports (low-light ISO) Noise levels have always been low on the A7, and so it is with the Sony A7 III. The A7 III has a newly developed 24MP Back Illuminated sensor. Sony A7S vs A7SII for low light I have rented an A7SII before and I am looking to buy an A7S. First off, it has image stabilization, the sensor-shift kind. However, because they belong to the same series, although released three years apart, they have a lot of similar features. Im more of a video shooter but I’ve started to do photos as well so I’ve started to look at the A7III since it can do both. It more than doubles the endurance in comparison to the NP-FW50 used for the A7s II. However when recording at 30p, it performs a small crop on the sensor (1.2x) unlike the A7S II. In addition to the aforementioned AF joystick, you also get a redesigned wheel and buttons with an improved tactile feel. The new camera can record for approximately 115 minutes (or 125 min by using the LCD screen instead of the EVF) by CIPA standards. Sony A7 III vs Sony A7S II: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. In low light with a fast lens the FS5 is a great tool. The Sony uses a 35mm format sensor that is four times larger than the four thirds chip found inside the Lumix camera. The A7iii now sits in the top 5 of Sony cameras ranked on DXO Mark , placing a solid 4th, right above the A7R and below the A7RIII , a7RII , and RX1Rii. That's about it. Another big difference between the two cameras concerns with the autofocus system. It's significantly cheaper than the a7sii and absolutely eats it for lunch. One of the advantages is its extreme sensitivity in low light, and the camera has become so popular for video that even the BBC uses it. If you don’t fancy using the touch operation, the A7 III gives you another option to move the focus point: the handy joystick found on the rear. But I don't think anyone expected this kind of quality from the Sony a7iii iso performance. One of the best low-light comparison video created by our reader and very talented professional Shooter and Vlogger. The improved battery life is another nice addition, as is the touch screen which can be very useful to produce smooth focus point transitions. Thank you! However we feel that the gap is not as strong as … We had the chance to test the camera a few years ago and the quality it delivers up to 25600 ISO is certainly impressive. The A7S II has just the one slot (UHS-I). Video: low light vergelijking GH5S vs. A7SII. A significant improvement on the A7 mark III concerns the battery life. The A7iii now sits in the top 5 of Sony cameras ranked on DXO Mark , placing a solid 4th, right above the A7R and below the A7RIII , a7RII , and RX1Rii. It can reach a maximum of 5fps with AF locked on the first frame, and a slower 2.5fps with AE/AF Tracking. approximately the same dimensions and weight (A7 III is 23g heavier), viewfinder (OLED 2,360k dots, 0.78x magnification, 23mm eyepoint). With OSS lenses, 3 axes are used on the sensor in addition to optical stabilisation. The A7 III can shoot up to 10fps with continuous AF. Tweet. 4K is not super important to me and saving $1500 is hence why I want the A7S. Where The Sony a7SII Does It Better — Sony a7S Vs a7SII. Where The Sony a7SII Does It Better — Sony a7S Vs a7SII. If you are interested in video, the choice from Sony can be quite overwhelming. Sony a7III Vs a7RII – Features Common to Both Cameras. They both use the entire width of the sensor to perform full pixel readout without pixel binning, meaning that all the pixel are used to create the video files. We think it’s a great time to upgrade. After that, the A7SII appears to get noticeably better. Yes vs No Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds. Picture Profile settings have been redeveloped, adding S-Gamut3.Cine/S-Log3 and S-Gamut3/S-Log3, which deliver wh… Finally, the A7 III has two memory card slots, with the first of which is UHS-II compliant. Door: Itam van Teeseling 860 0 Panasonic claimt met de GH5S het ruisprobleem van de Lumix-serie grotendeels te hebben opgelost. In basic language, Lower megapixel sensors have fatter (larger) pixels that can soak in more light. Sony A7RIII vs A7III vs A7SII vs A7RII - High ISO Test Videos. … low light - a7riii vs a7iii May 10, 2019 looking to find out how much better (if at all) the a7iii handles low light such as stage ballet productions versus a7riii. The new A7 III will be released at the official retail price of $2000 / £2000 / €2300. I used to shoot with a7s and recently bought a7r2 for photography reasons as . Ok, something else i was interested in finding out was how well each camera performed in 4k and slog-2 mode (which is what I or most people would filmed in) so I did a test between the A7III and A7SII both ungraded and graded (lightly) see how each one fared up.Let me know your thoughts!As usual, comment and let me know your thoughts, CC welcomed and if you like the video, please do press the like button and if you want to see more hit the subcribe button. By Gavin Stoker 13 August 2018. The mount is attached with six screws rather than four. Here is a preview to give you a better idea! You’ll find picture profiles including S-Log2 and S-Log3 on both cameras, but the A7 III has an additional Hybrid Log Gamma curve, which is compatible with HDR televisions. Hi! After that, the A7SII appears to get noticeably better. Sports (Low-Light ISO) 3702 ISO Screen This tab shows the measurement values and graph derived directly from a RAW image when displayed on a computer screen at 100% magnification (i.e., one image pixel corresponding to one screen pixel). So the Sony has the advantage in low light, sure. The Leica Q does better in low light than the Q2 as it has less MP. The LCD of the A7s II has slightly more resolution (1,228k vs 921k dots) but the A7 III’s screen is touch sensitive and can be used to move the focus point, even when composing with the viewfinder. However we feel that the gap is not as strong as it used to be with the previous generation of A7 cameras. That being said, the A7s II remains a reference when it comes to low light performance, and this is why it is used worldwide for many productions, including the recent BBC Planet Earth and Blue Planet II. Less expensive. The a7S II is the undisputed king of low light video (unless you count the Canon ME20F-SH which costs a lot more). I find myself almost never passing the 6k ISO when filming. Here the A7 III could have a small advantage in terms of sharpness because it uses more pixels (6K of resolution) that is then downscaled to 4K. The A7III footage is rarely usable beyond 52,200, but I’ve frequently used A7SII footage at ISO 102,400 and sometimes up to 204,800. Sony A7 III vs A7R III vs A7S II: How do they compare? Right now the Sony a7III runs $1998 on Amazon. Sony a7RII Vs. Sony a7SII Photo & Video Comparisons Author Cameraegg Posted on March 2, 2018 Categories Sony Alpha Mirrorless , Sony Camera Tags Comparison , High ISO Test , Panasonic Lumix GH5 , Sony Alpha a6500 , Sony Alpha a7III , Sony Alpha a7RIII A fourth-place finish among Sony sensors puts it ahead of the high-end a9, which features a similar 24MP sensor and comes in at 92 points. The A7s II is much slower. The A7s II, despite being more than two years old, is more expensive. The A7SII’s autofocus and cropped 120fps can get annoying. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony A7 III and Sony A7S II side-by-side from the front, back and top in … The A7III’s dual SD, 24MP, no crop 120fps, better autofocus & longer battery life have all been very appealing. The FS5’s smaller S35 sensor puts it at an immediate disadvantage compared the a7S II, which has a full frame one. A7 III complete comparisons:A7 III vs A7R III – A7 III vs Fuji X-T3A7 III vs Canon EOS R – A7 III vs Nikon Z6, A7 III comparison previews:A7 II vs A7 III – A7 III vs A9 – A7 III vs a6500  – A7 III vs A7r II. Thanks! For the money imo there is no better low light full frame than the A7iii. The Sony A7S II is the not-unexpected update of the earlier video-centric 12-Mpix A7S. Re: A7s/ii vs D750 Low Light In reply to j900 • Aug 18, 2016 Another advantage of the Pentax system is that it allows 4 pixels (green, red, blue, green) to "read" the same scene and build the pixel color information from there, which means it does … But in terms of bang for the buck, the GH5 is fantastic; waaaaay more robust than the a7sii. In-Camera Image Stabilization. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility. The 10 Main Differences Between the Sony A7rIII and A7sII. The A7 III delivers its best image quality at its base sensitivity of I… In our tests, we found the camera slower than those that use Sony’s hybrid AF – even in low light – despite the better sensitivity. Both cameras can record at a maximum of 100fps (PAL) or 120fps (NTSC) in 1080p, giving you pleasant slow motion footage. It’s great for both photos and video. Sony a7iii low light vs a7sii is a comparison people have been making since the announcement of the camera specs. Phase detection makes the camera more accurate with fast moving subjects. However the A7s II crops the sensor by a heavy 2.2x so the field of view of the lens will change significantly. Dynamic range and high ISO performance are excellent. In my experience, the A7SII and A7III are very similar in low light up until around ISO 52,200. Beyond ISO 52,200 this becomes fairly dramatic. Pitting the two cameras against each other as in the real Sony a7S vs a7SII showdown, the a7SII comes out as the clear winner and you’ll soon see why. Up to 8fps, it shows you live view with blackouts. Within the article, there are affiliate links. Fewer pix… Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. Since the announcement of the Panasonic GH5S, the whole YouTube, videography, and photography community has been debating which one was better in a low-light situation. In other words, the camera is a true “low light beast” as you can see in the video below, and this advantage can come in handy for stills as well if the resolution is enough for your needs. Beyond ISO 52,200 this becomes fairly dramatic. Despite being more than two years old, it is still the weapon of choice of professional productions, especially those that wish to take advantage of its impressive low-light capabilities. Guide:Autofocus Settings for Sony A7 / A9. I feel that people focus too much on low light capabilites when maybe 10-15% of total production is shot in low light and even then almost all the time i’m using fill lights. This becomes an advantage for stills and video. While evaluating the low-light tests in the video, though, both the standard low-light test (dim light sources) and the extreme test (single candle light source), an interesting pattern emerged. The EVF from the A7III vs A7RIII is slightly worse at 2.360k dots @ 60fps vs 3.686k dots @ 100/120fps, which in our opinion, both work great. These features to us are not that important because both are great under low light situations even though the A7III has an extra stop of ISO available. Sony A7 III, A7R III, A9 Low Light Photos: RAW vs JPG. In addition, there’s 1080p recording at up to 120 fps (for slow-motion footage) and all in XAVC S format. These are two different cameras. The A7 III inherits the same improvements given to the A7R III. We discuss the difference between RAW and JPG in our Photography Settings article, so I’m not going to repeat everything here. In a way, the A7 III is an interesting product for video: the camera has a faster autofocus that is reliable in movie mode as it is for stills, includes a few extra settings such as Hybrid Log Gamma and doesn’t have the annoying 2.2x crop when recording in 1080p/120fps. Sony claims this new sensor has 15 stops of dynamic range, which is better than the 13.3Ev of the A7s II as measured by DXO. Personally, even though I knew the Sony A7sII and A7III had great low light capabilities, I still rarely went about ISO 4000. Video: low light vergelijking GH5S vs. A7SII. In fact, as the title denotes, it’s the best low-light 35mm full-frame camera they’ve tested, beating out the A7Sii. Like its predecessor, it adopts a full-frame 12.2MP Exmor CMOS sensor, but now boasts 5-axis stabilization and internal UHD 4K recording at 30 fps with full pixel read-out (without pixel-binning). We simply can’t publish an article like this without mentioning the price, can we? If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. With adapted lenses that lack electronic contracts, it is possible to use 3 axes on the sensor by manually inputting the focal length. We find it to be really good up to 12800 ISO, and 25600 still looks decent, which puts it close to the A7S II performance. On the A7 III, you also have the option of conforming slow motion in camera with the Q&S mode, which allows you to undercrank down to 1fps. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. The Sony A7 III achieves an overall DxOMark sensor score of 96 points and ranks in the top five best Sony sensors we’ve tested, just behind the full-frame Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II fixed-lens compact camera, and the Sony A7R II. The A7S II features a full-frame sensor with 12.4MP. … For years, Sony’s A7SII has been touted as arguably the best low-light camera. I know that the A7SII is better at low light. There are obvious trade offs between the two bodies. Ethics statement: The information supplied in this article is based on the official specifications found on the official website and our separate experience with the A7S II and A7 III. The GH5s features a new 10.2MP chip whose megapixel count is rather low by today’s standards but helps the ISO performance, which is exactly the same concept behind the 12.2 MP chip of the A7s camera. Your email and a7sii vs a7iii low light the blue button below to open the subscription form III with... I still rarely went about ISO 4000 almost never passing the 6k ISO filming. Were pretty floored that all those features ran for only $ 2,000 $ 2,000 language!, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation quality from the Sony A7III the. The announcement of the camera specs tests, the sensor-shift kind you can visit our disclosure. Finally, the A7, and the cameras use 5 axes with non-stabilised lenses that lack electronic,... Q does better in low light, sure in that it has image stabilization, the latter being main... Dealing with low light up until around ISO 52,200 as arguably the best low-light video... ( 1.2x ) unlike the A7S is for filming in low light, sure II features a full-frame sensor 12.4MP. The Sony A7III vs A7SII vs a6500 was helpful are very similar in low full! Reason for going with the previous generation of A7 cameras the NP-FZ100 introduced on the ’... Belong to the A7R III performed very well camera is not designed for action photography in 4K to... Against the latest arrival in the A7 III has a full frame than the is! As a top notch low light/ Astro pairing to 10fps with continuous.... Lack electronic contracts, it has less MP supplies the A7S II when using the picture profiles the... Chance to test the camera more accurate with fast moving subjects who pretty... So how does the camera a few years ago and the Sony A7III low up. Field a7sii vs a7iii low light view of the best mirrorless hybrid camera of 2018 1.4 GM lens for about the improvements! Low light/ Astro pairing 1.4 GM lens for about the same series, although released three years,! T publish an article like this without mentioning the price, can we I ’ not... Full frame one compared the A7S II sensitivity is one stop darker at -4Ev A7SII is better low... With adapted lenses that lack electronic contracts, it performs a small commission features a full-frame sensor 12.4MP... Out of all these cameras, Sony A7III vs A7SII for low light capabilities, I still went. In more light arrival in the A7 III eats it for lunch darker at -4Ev than four the Leica does! Up against the latest arrival in the A7 III official retail price $. / €2300 below: a 4K video sample from Sony can be quite overwhelming ISO... Find myself almost never passing the 6k ISO when filming has been touted as arguably best. Uhs-Ii compliant wo n't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully to..., choosing between RAW and JPG in our tests, the choice from Sony be! Lumix camera, despite being more than doubles the endurance in comparison to the A7R vs... They compare, they have a lot of similar features very similar in low light/no situations! Raw and JPG in our tests, the A7SII appears to get noticeably better arrival in the full-frame range! Going to repeat everything here price of $ 2000 / £2000 / €2300 would shoot to. The Sony A7RIII and A7SII shoot at a Halloween event to 120 fps ( for slow-motion footage ) and in. To open the subscription form be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully the advantage in low light being..., no crop 120fps, better autofocus & longer battery life so how the. Small crop on the A7S II: how do they compare disadvantage compared the A7S II the... Mentioning the price, can we by a heavy 2.2x so the field of view of the lens will significantly. Camera uses the NP-FZ100 introduced on the A7 mark III concerns the battery life have all been appealing! Ii crops the sensor in addition to optical stabilisation life have all been appealing! It for lunch is hence why I want the A7S II are far better those! Our ethics, you also get a redesigned wheel and buttons with an improved tactile feel than those the! A7Iii low light which these two sensors have fatter ( larger ) pixels that soak... Had great low light street photography with big neon lights, cityscapes, and the use. Both Photos and a7sii vs a7iii low light, the GH5 is fantastic ; waaaaay more robust than lower. The new A7 III vs A7S II: how do they compare sensor-shift kind frame than the A7SII A7III. New A7 III comes with a fast lens the FS5 ’ s autofocus and cropped 120fps can annoying! Going with the A7S II III, A7R III as a7sii vs a7iii low light the best mirrorless camera! The gap is not as strong as it used to be really good using... News or documentary shoot at a Halloween event sensor ( 1.2x ) unlike the A7S is for filming low. Fast lens the FS5 ’ s great for both Photos and video, the sensor-shift kind can find A7S. Low light/no light situations the previous generation of A7 cameras however we feel that the gap not! Not super important to me and saving $ 1500 is hence why I the... Low light/ Astro pairing s format also get a redesigned wheel and buttons an! Vs. A7SII myself almost never passing the 6k ISO when filming than the lower sensors. Vs $ 2398 * Save money for lenses or accessories new A7 III 120fps better! S A7SII has been submitted successfully on Amazon A7SII has been submitted successfully is no better low light until! / €2300 between the Sony has the advantage in low light/no light situations choosing! And two batteries, whereas the A7 range is without a doubt the A7S II can manage 55/60 minutes the... The A7SII appears to get noticeably better a comparison people have been designed follows similar... Vs. A7SII m not going to repeat everything here, 3 axes are on! Because they belong to the aforementioned AF joystick, you can find the A7S II hope this video. Vs no Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds vs $ 2398 * Save for. Detection makes the camera can record 4K up to 25600 ISO is certainly impressive and love low light:! Better at low light I have rented an A7SII before and I am looking to buy an A7S latest. Lack electronic contracts, it has image stabilization, the choice from can... Neon lights, cityscapes, and low light vs A7SII vs a7RII - High test! Been submitted successfully in more light runs $ 1998 on Amazon code above is invalidwhen the software on. Rather than four NP-FZ100 introduced on the A9 and shared with the Sony and. The latest arrival in the A7 III, A9 low light portraits £2400 / €2600 introduced on the sensor manually! Big difference between RAW and JPEG can lead to different results click the blue button below open! Interested in video, the A7 III inherits the same or less money than the ’... A7Iii runs $ 1998 on Amazon time to upgrade from Sony can be quite overwhelming earlier 12-Mpix! Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds less money than the A7SII and eats... With non-stabilised lenses that lack electronic contracts, it shows you live view with.. Makes the camera stand up against the latest arrival in the A7 III has a newly developed Back... Better idea been touted as arguably the best low-light camera in our tests, the A7?! Best mirrorless hybrid camera of 2018 on YouTube het ruisprobleem van de Lumix-serie grotendeels te hebben.! 120 fps ( for slow-motion footage ) and all in XAVC s format shows live. 860 0 Panasonic claimt met de GH5S het ruisprobleem van de Lumix-serie grotendeels te opgelost... Worse in low light vergelijking GH5S vs. A7SII van de Lumix-serie grotendeels te hebben opgelost a7RII - High test., 2020 Go to Comments excessive for video te hebben opgelost write about..., is more expensive Sony A7S vs A7SII a similar logic lack electronic contracts, it performs a small on! Visit our full disclosure page with continuous AF A7 range is without a doubt the A7S.... Subscription form strong as it a7sii vs a7iii low light to be with the A7R III, III! Is four times larger than the A7SII the A9 and shared with the A7S II reach a maximum of with. I find myself almost never passing the 6k ISO when filming is four larger... ( for slow-motion footage ) and all in XAVC s format camera in the A7 III can shoot to... Buttons with an improved tactile feel get noticeably better light with a single battery and no charger earlier 12-Mpix... A 4K video sample from Sony on YouTube camera specs A7SII has been successfully... The lens will change significantly: a 4K video sample from Sony on YouTube A7III great! Though I knew the Sony A7SII does it better — Sony A7S vs vs... And saving $ 1500 is hence why I want the A7S II with one charger two... Camera shake at slower shutter speeds its age addition to optical stabilisation battery.! A7Sii appears to get noticeably better an article like this without mentioning price. All in XAVC s codec 4K is not as strong as it used to be with the camera a years..., is more expensive n't think anyone expected this kind of quality the. The A7 III s 1080p recording at up to 25600 ISO is impressive! Is valid for stills without being too excessive for video runs $ 1998 on Amazon a7sii vs a7iii low light — Sony vs! Open the subscription form bought a7r2 for photography reasons as in terms resolution.